Movies | TV | Books | Quotes Easter Eggs | Drink Recipes
[Slipups.com Logo] The Slip-Up ArchiveTM
SLIPUPS.COM
Google
Web slipups.com
Home > Movies > Q - T > Scream 3 Bloopers Add a Slip-Up | Help
   
Scream 3 - Strange Body Shapes!
Ok, when we see Sydney running about towards the end of the film (When she gets shot etc and we find out who the killer is) she has a very shapely figure "up-top" to say the least, but when she pulls up her top to reveal the bullet proof vest, her chest is pushed quite flat and a different shaped to before! Also, is it just me, or did it look like Sydney was shot point-blank in the neck? How would she survive that?
Special Requirements:
The movie
Avg. Rating:    7.1 of 10 - (41 votes cast)
Your Rating:   
Contributed By:
Brendon on 06-09-2000
Reviewed By:
Webmaster

Pictures Click on the thumbnails for a full-size image, or send in your own
Be the first to send us your picture of this Slip-Up!
Comments:
ScreamQueen writes:
Actually, you're all wrong. Well, the only person who was semi-right was the one person who was criticized for being so. First, the person who said that in the original ending, Sidney was not supposed to get shot, was correct. It can be seen in the alternate ending on the DVD. He was then corrected and told that the DVD and the VHS is the same thing without that person even realizing what he meant. Shame on you. Before you correct a person, make sure that the information you're correcting with is right. It makes it less humiliating for you later on when someone corrects YOU. Okay, next: The second bullet that was shot did NOT hit Sidney in the neck, nor did he miss. I honestly doubt that from that close range, he could miss. But what you can count on is Roman not thinking that she would be wearing a bulletproof vest. Therefore, he would really have no reason to shoot her in the neck. Especially when shooting her in the heart area would guarantee a kill (only if you're not wearing a bullet-proof vest though - which Roman did not know about). The bullet actually hit Sidney in the heart area. If you want to see this, all you need to do is have a little patience and slow motion the scene. You can see where he shoots her because immediately after, there is a bullet hole in her shirt where the second bullet hits. However, you can only see this for a split second after the shoot, because then she rolls over. Slowing down the scene is the only way to see where she gets hit. Hope this clarifies things for you guys. So, basically, this isn't a slip-up at all.
6 of 6 people found this comment helpful. Did you? Yes
Jules Winfield writes:
i watched the movie yesterday, and i also noticed that the second shot the killer fired at sid was directly in the neck!
2 of 3 people found this comment helpful. Did you? Yes
jesse writes:
No, it did hit him the neck. If it did hit her in the necklace, it would shatter it.
1 of 1 people found this comment helpful. Did you? Yes
Brendon writes:
Thats exactly what i thought, i was sure she was dead cos it really looked like a point-blank neck shot. Bullet-proof necklace too maybe?
1 of 2 people found this comment helpful. Did you? Yes
Jules Winfield writes:
well, you never know...
1 of 2 people found this comment helpful. Did you? Yes
Denpeck writes:
I know why. In the original ending they never had sid getting shot. this can be found on the dvd version
0 of 0 people found this comment helpful. Did you? Yes
ScreamQueen05 writes:
It only looks like she gets shot in the neck and it comes really close but it just misses her and that is why she moved.
1 of 2 people found this comment helpful. Did you? Yes
ScreamQueen05 writes:
As I said before it missed her neck either that or it bounced off her necklace that she got from Derek in Scream2 she never took that necklace off And Denpeck in the VHS it does show her getting shot it's not just the DVD I mean Duh its the same movie!
0 of 0 people found this comment helpful. Did you? Yes


Register - My Settings - FAQ - Privacy Policy - About Us - Contact Us